Evaluasi Biaya pada Pembangunan Gedung Auditorium Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Kota Makassar

Authors

  • Martin Hamkas Teknik Sipil Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar
  • Hanafi Ashad Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar
  • Sofyan Bachmid Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jutin.v8i2.42693

Keywords:

Cost Efficiency, Planning Review, Building Construction

Abstract

The construction of the Maritime Science Polytechnic building in Makassar City (PIP), is based on the results of a planning review which consists of several activity components, namely; Preparation of work, Land, Structure, Architecture, Mechanical, Power House. With reference to the RAB, the Structure component constitutes the largest portion of the budget allocation of Rp. 51,058,734,268.85. In this way, these work items allow for evaluation, with the aim of efficiency or cost savings while remaining functional and maintaining good quality. Using the evaluation method approach, the floor base plate work item which is the sub-work of the BOC -010 elevation structure which originally used reinforcement using the conventional method was changed to using Wiremesh. After analyzing the reinforcement calculations, it was found that As w > As needed = 904.32 mm2 > 723,456 mm2. So the use of D20-150 iron bar can be replaced with M12-150 wiremesh iron. The results obtained from the results of the conversion analysis which originally used D20 – 150 iron bars, the unit price for conventional iron was Rp. 16,347.56 per kilogram to wiremesh M 12-150 unit price of Rp. 10,060.96 per kilogram. The final results show that;  conventional reinforcement according to plan Rp., 16,347.56 x 122,976 = Rp. 2,010,357,646.00 while the price after changes (wiremesh) is IDR 10,060.96 x 122,976.00 = IDR. 1,237,256,616.96. The research results show that in terms of costs, by replacing conventional iron with wire mesh, savings of IDR 1,522,768,824.03 are obtained or with a savings weight of 1.19% of the total budget amount. 

References

Adhi, R. P., Hidayat, A., & Nugroho, H. (2016). Perbandingan efisiensi waktu, biaya, dan sumber daya manusia antara metode Building Information Modelling (BIM) dan konvensional (studi kasus: perencanaan gedung 20 lantai). Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 5(2), 220-229.

Aryadi, S. M. P., & Herzanita, A. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Volume Pekerjaan Konstruksi Menggunakan Metode Bim Dan Konvensional. Construction And Material Journal, 6(1), 85-92.

Azari, R., Kurniawan, D., & Yusman, A. S. (2022). Tinjauan Anggaran Biaya Pembangunan Labor SMP Negeri 3 Bukittinggi Menggunakan Software Tekla Structure. Ensiklopedia Research and Community Service Review, 2(1), 2777-284.

Fadillah, M. (2022). Quantity Take-Off Pekerjaan Struktur Berbasis Building Information Modeling (Bim) Pembangunan Gedung Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Balige. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Agregat, 2(1), 24-34.

Farizwan, J., Hariyadi, H., & Hamdani, H. (2024). Studi Efisiensi Volume Material Dan Estimasi Biaya Bangunan Menggunakan Bim 5d Dengan Software Tekla Structures: Study On Material Volume Efficiency And Building Cost Estimation Using 5d Bim With Tekla Structures Software. Spektrum Sipil, 11(2), 109-118.

Ferdinand, F., & Adianto, Y. L. (2022). Penerapan Value Engineering pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Serbaguna X di Kota Medan. Journal of Sustainable Construction, 1(2), 10-18.

Ginting, L. H., & Nusa, A. B. (2023). Analisis Value Engineering Pada Proyek Pembangunan Puskesmas Medan Johor. Buletin Utama Teknik, 18(2), 204-208.

Huzaini, S. (2021). Penerapan konsep building information modelling (BIM) 3D dalam mendukung pengestimasian biaya pekerjaan struktur.

Mulyono, B., Zain, H. A., & Sudibyo, G. H. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Efektifitas Metode Konvensional Dan Bim Pada Elemen Struktur Beton (Studi Kasus Gedung Pelayanan Pendidikan Fisip Unsoed). Jurnal Disprotek, 13(1), 37-44.

Pratama, R. E., Hendriyani, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2024). Implementasi Konsep Building Information Modelling (Bim) 5d Pada Pekerjaan Struktur Untuk Efisiensi Biaya Proyek. Jtt (Jurnal Teknologi Terpadu), 12(2), 138-143.

Putra, Y. D., Hendriyani, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2024). Analisis Building Information Modelling (BIM) 5D Pada Pekerjaan Struktur Graha Sucofindo Balikpapan. Jurnal Konstruksi, 22(2), 108-115.

Respati, R., Pratama, R. A., Saputra, N. A., & Jaya, H. P. (2024). Anaisis Pengaruh Rekayasa Nilai Terhadap Penjadwalan dan Biaya Paket Pembangunan Gudang Bahan dan Workshop Peralatan BPJN Kaltara. Agregat, 9(2), 1197-1205.

Suasira, I. W., Tapayasa, I. M., Santiana, I. M. A., & Wibawa, I. G. S. (2021). Analisis Komparasi Metode Building Information Modeling (Bim) Dan Metode Konvensional Pada Perhitungan Rab Struktur Proyek (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Pasar Desa Adat Pecatu). Jurnal Teknik Gradien, 13(1), 12-19.

Umam, F. N., Erizal, E., & Putra, H. (2022). Peningkatan Efisiensi Biaya Pembangunan Gedung Bertingkat Dengan Aplikasi Building Information Modeling (BIM) 5D. Teras Jurnal: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 12(1), 245-256.

Usboko, G. P., Seran, G., & Pattiraja, A. H. (2024). Penerapan Value Engineering Pada Elemen Bangunan Gedung (Tangga) Balai Latihan Kerja UPTP Kupang. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 9628-9647.

Wisman, K. C., Tavio, T., & Iranata, D. (2022). Optimasi Desain Balok dan Kolom Gedung Twin Tower Makassar dengan Menggunakan Microsoft Excel VBA terhadap Sisi Kekuatan Lentur, Geser, dan Biaya. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 11(3), D120-D125.

Zahro, P. K., Ratnaningsih, A., & Hasanuddin, A. (2021). Evaluasi Perancangan Anggaran Biaya dan Waktu Menggunakan Metode BIM.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

Hamkas, M., Ashad, H., & Bachmid, S. (2025). Evaluasi Biaya pada Pembangunan Gedung Auditorium Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Kota Makassar. Jurnal Teknik Industri Terintegrasi (JUTIN), 8(2), 1657–1664. https://doi.org/10.31004/jutin.v8i2.42693

Issue

Section

Articles of Research

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.