Kajian kinerja manajemen konstruksi dalam proyek pembangunan Water Treatment Plant (WTP) 300 LPD Simoro Sulawesi Tengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jutin.v8i1.40344Keywords:
Construction Management, Critical Path Method (CPM), Time Cost Trade- Off (TCTO), Time Efficiency, Cost EfficiencyAbstract
The construction of the Simoro Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in Gumbasa District, Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi, is a complex project aimed at improving regional infrastructure. This research aims to analyze the construction management of the project by applying the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Time Cost Trade Off (TCTO) methods to enhance time and cost efficiency. The CPM method is used to identify the project's critical path and manage activities that most affect the total project duration. Meanwhile, TCTO is analyzed to optimize the additional costs needed to accelerate project completion without compromising the quality of the final results. The research results indicate that: (1) using the CPM method and Primavera software, the activities on the critical path include Start (Preparation), Cleaning and leveling work, Earth excavation work, Aggregate Base Layer B work, Earth excavation work, Aggregate Base Layer B work, Cut and Fill work, Bore Pile work (Reservoir), Earthwork (Reservoir), Pile Cap Foundation work (Reservoir), Concrete Floor work, Reservoir Tank work, Bore Pile Foundation work for Clearwell, Bore Pile Foundation work for IPA Building, Earthwork for IPA Building, Structure work for Coagulation Building, Structure work for Flocculation Building, Structure work for Sedimentation Building, Mechanical work, Electrical work, Scada Instrument, and Commissioning Test. (2) From the application of Time Cost Trade Off (TCTO) analysis, the lowest implementation cost obtained is Rp. 78,262,088,288.34 with the Crash condition of the implementation time being 913 days. This research provides significant contributions to improving construction management performance, particularly in terms of time and cost efficiency, and offers practical guidance for project managers in developing better and more effective project management strategies.References
Abduh, M., & Fauzi, R. T. (2012). Kajian sistem assessment proses konstruksi pada greenship rating tool. Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil, 6, 2012.
Allu, A., Ahmad, M. S., & Nurdiansyah, W. (2023). Evaluasi Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah Domestik Skala Pemukiman Di Kabupaten Luwu Timur. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 29(2), 147-170.
Ananta, R. (2024). Evaluasi Milestone Hydrotest Boiler Unit 1 PLTU Palu 3 (2x50 MW). Jurnal Profesi Insinyur Indonesia, 2(4).
Belfry, M. (2024). Microsoft Project vs Primavera P6 (Which is Better?). Diambil kembali dari onsite-training.com: https://www.onsite-training.com/microsoft-project-vs-primavera-p6/
Cluster, L. (2024, Desember 18). What is Oracle Primavera P6? Diambil kembali dari Invensis Learning Servicer: https://www.invensislearning.com/blog/what-is-oracle-primavera-p6/
Hamzah, E., Ashad, H., & Bachmid, S. (2022, April 30). Analisis Kinerja Biaya dan Waktu Pelaksanaan Konstruksi Akibat Perubahan Desain (Studi KasusPembangunan Flat Dalmas Polda Sulsel). Jurnal Konstruksi (JK-TIS), Vol. 01(04), 25-36.
Hansen, S. (2017). Manajemen Kontrak Konstruksi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hapsari, W. P., Huda, M., & Rini, T. S. (2019). Pengaruh manajemen komunikasi terhadap kinerja proyek konstruksi (Studi kasus di kota Surabaya). axial: jurnal rekayasa dan manajemen konstruksi, 6(3), 207-214.
Hecker, L. (2024, Mei 16). Primavera P6 vs Microsoft Project: 8 Advantages of Primavera P6. Diambil kembali dari Taradigm: https://www.taradigm.com/primavera-p6-vs-microsoft-project-7-advantages-of-primavera-p6/
Ibrahim, M., Nawaz, M. H., Rout, P. R., Lim, J. W., Mainali, B., & Shahid, M. K. (2023). Advances in produced water treatment technologies: An in-depth exploration with an emphasis on membrane-based systems and future perspectives. Water, 15(16), 2980.
Mahendra, R. D., Musa, R., & Ashad, H. (2022). Evaluasi Kinerja PDAM Kabupaten Luwu: Studi Kasus Kecamatan Belopa Dan Belopa Utara. Jurnal Konstruksi: Teknik, Infrastruktur dan Sains, 1(10), 52-61.
Musa, R. (2022). Kajian Percepatan Durasi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Gedung Utama Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Mamuju Pasca Gempa Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. Jurnal Konstruksi: Teknik, Infrastruktur dan Sains, 1(6), 20-29.
Rijal, S., & Musa, R. (2022). Analisis Efektifitas Penerapan Fast Tracking pada Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Gedung Kantor Walikota Kendari. Jurnal Flyover, 2(2), 123-135.
Sanggoro, H. B., Rustendi, I., Pramono, S. A., & Bintoro, B. P. K. (2022). Efektivitas Komitmen Pengelolaan Risiko Lingkungan dan Sosial dalam Organisasi Penyedia Jasa Konstruksi. Semesta Teknika, 25(2), 146-160.
Syara, E., Ashad, H., & Bachmid, S. (2023). Analisis Metode Least Cost Analysis dan Metode Fast Tracking pada Pembangunan Kantor Kejaksaan Negeri Makassar. Jurnal Flyover, Vol. 03(01), 1-10.
Tamlikha, A., Rezagama, A., & Handayani, D. S. Analisis Ekonomi Lingkungan Terhadap Pembangunan Waduk Jatibarang Kota Semarang (Doctoral dissertation, Diponegoro University).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adhim Borahima

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.