METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES: INVESTIGATING EFL STUDENTS' SELF-EVALUATION OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCE DURING ONLINE LEARNING

Authors

  • Ryantika Dyah Safitri Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, Universitas Tidar
  • Lilia Indriani Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v3i2.1398

Keywords:

Self-Evaluation, Speaking Performance.

Abstract

This study examines an investigation toward EFL students' self-evaluation in speaking performance to report the metacognitive strategies using during an online class. The participants were 35 EFL students at the English Department of a state university. Self-evaluation is a type of metacognitive strategy in which students assess and measure their work (Amanda Arp, 2016). This study is based on previous research regarding self-evaluation by Amanda Arp in 2016. Researcher using the coding self-evaluation that was adapted from thirty self-evaluations based on the use of descriptive coding (Saldaña). A questionnaire was administered to the EFL students to explore their self-evaluation strategy towards their speaking performance during online classes. The results show that there are almost all participants applied the Metacognitive strategy which is self-evaluation toward their speaking performance during an online class

Author Biographies

Ryantika Dyah Safitri, Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, Universitas Tidar

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, Universitas Tidar

Lilia Indriani, Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, Universitas Tidar

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FKIP, Universitas Tidar

References

Ahangari, S., Rassekh-Alqol, B., & Hamed, L. A. A. (2013). The effect of peer assessment on oral presentation in an EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(3), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.3p.45

Al-Alwan, A., Asassfeh, S., & Al-Shboul, Y. (2013). EFL learners’ listening comprehension and awareness of metacognitive strategies: How are they related. International Education Studies, 6(9), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n9p31

Ariyanti, A. (2016). Psychological Factors Affecting EFL Students’ Speaking Performance. ASIAN TEFL Journal of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.21462/asiantefl.v1i1.14

Arp, A. (2016). Examining Student Metacognition when Self- Evaluating Public Speaking by.

Asakereh, A., & Dehghannezhad, M. (2015). Student satisfaction with EFL speaking classes: Relating speaking self-efficacy and skills achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 345–363.

Çağatay, S. (2015). Examining EFL Students’ Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: The Case at a Turkish State University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.594

Djahimo, S. E. . (2018). Student anxiety and their speaking performance: teaching EFL to Indonesian student. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n3.235

Ellis, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Enhancing Self-Monitoring during Self-Regulated Learning of Speech. 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_10

Fazeli, S. H. (2012). Use of the metacognitive English language learning strategies based on personality traits. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.531-539

Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M. (2018). Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9176-z

Hosni, S. (2014). Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(6), 22–30.

Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2020). A questionnaire to assess students’ beliefs about peer-feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1630294

J. H. Flavell. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Joo, S. H. (2016). Self- and Peer-Assessment of Speaking. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 68–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8FN2D1S

Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M., & Vaste, G. (2009). Adaptive learning with the LS-Plan system: A field evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2009.25

Meijer, J., Sleegers, P., Elshout-Mohr, M., van Daalen-Kapteijns, M., Meeus, W., & Tempelaar, D. (2013). The development of a questionnaire on metacognition for students in higher education. Educational Research, 55(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.767024

Oxford. (1989). how well the statement describes YOU. English, 0.

OZTURK, N. (2017). Assessing Metacognition: Theory and Practices. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, March 2017, 134–134. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.298299

Prof. Ag. Bambang Setiyadi; Ph.D. (2016). LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY QUESTIONNAIRE (LLSQ) A Measurement to Identify Students’ Learning Strategies and Prepare the Success of Learning English in the Indonesian Context (Empirical Evidence). Graha Ilmu, 1–124.

Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning english as a foreign language: An overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.019

Robertson, P., & Nunn, R. (2011). How_English_L2_learners_in_China_perceive_and_inte. 13(1).

Savira, S. I., & Laksmiwati, H. (2017). Self-Assessment to Assess Student’s Performance in Academic Task to Improve Metacognition. 118, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.2991/icset-17.2017.14

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). MAI Tabela 1 MB. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. https://www.harford.edu/~/media/PDF/Student-Services/Tutoring/Metacognition Awareness Inventory.ashx

Setiyadi, A. B. (2001). Language Learning Strategies: Classification and Pedagogical Implication. TEFLIN Journal, 12(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v12i1/15-28

Sevilla Morales, H., & Gamboa Mena, R. (2017). Student Self-Evaluation and Autonomy Development in EFL Learning. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 25, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.15517/rlm.v0i25.27695

Shannon, S. (2008). Using metacognitive strategies and learning styles to create self-directed learners. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1(2001), 14–28. http://www.auburn.edu/academic/education/ilsrj/Journal Volumes/Fall 2008 Volume 1 PDFs/Metacognitive Strategies and Learning Styles.pdf%0Ahttp://www.auburn.edu/~witteje/ilsrj/Journal Volumes/Fall 2008 Volume 1 PDFs/Metacognitive Strategies and Learning St

Ünver, M. M., Aydın, B., & Eş, Ş. (2016). A Preliminary Study on Oral Performances of English learners in L1 and L2. Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.69829

Xu, W. (2012). A survey on metacognitive strategy use in college oral English study under internet environment-with a case study of Guilin University of Technology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1430–1435. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.7.1430-1435

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Safitri, R. D., & Indriani, L. (2020). METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES: INVESTIGATING EFL STUDENTS’ SELF-EVALUATION OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCE DURING ONLINE LEARNING. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 3(2), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v3i2.1398