PRACTICING DESIGN THINKING TO IGNITE STUDENT CREATIVITY IN RESPONSE TO RENEWABLE ENERGY ISSUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v7i1.25089Keywords:
Design Thinking, Kreativitas, Energi Alternatif.Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengivestigasi penerapan design thinking dalam merespon isu energi terbarukan untuk membangkitkan kreativitas siswa. Studi ini menantang siswa untuk menjawab masalah user (driver online) berkaitan dengan energi melalui tahap empati, define, idate, prototype dan testing. Sebanyak 36 siswa kelas 10 di sebuah sekolah menengah atas negeri di Jakarta diteliti secara kualitatif dengan menggunakan berbagai teknik pengumpulan data, termasuk wawancara semi terstruktur, jurnal reflektif, observasi kelas, catatan lapangan, dan tes formatif yang dibangun atas indikator kreativitas oleh Susan M. Brookhart meliputi variasi ide dan konteks, variasi sumber, menyusun dan mengkombinasikan ide, dan mengkomunikasikan sesuatu yang baru. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan indikator kreativitas yang paling berkembang selama penelitian adalah variasi ide dan konteks. Aktivitas design thinking mendorong peserta didik lebih percaya diri dalam berpendapat dan berinovasi. Hasil prototype tiap grup berhasil mengkonversi energi surya, energi kimia dan energi kinetik menjadi energi listrik dengan model yang berbeda. Nilai kebaharuan alat prototipe yaitu dapat berfungsi sebagai penghasil energi terbarukan. Kebermaknaan setiap alat dapat berfungsi menyediakan kebutuhan energi listrik untuk memperlancar dan meningkatkan produktivitas kerja. Penelitian lebih lanjut dapat dilakukan dengan mengevaluasi prototipe agar menghasilkan tegangan listrik yang stabil dan optimal. Topik lain berkaitan dengan sains dapat diterapkan dalam pembelajaran dengan tahap design thinking.References
Ackermann, E. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3-Gdmm0-2wAC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=design+thinking+in+learning&ots=TlOG6i9pxR&sig=2tlsQ4DIHFSaTgGEeZruK2T7z60
Ananda, L. R., Rahmawati, Y., & Khairi, F. (2023). Critical thinking skills of Chemistry students by integrating design thinking with STEAM-PjBL. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 352. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1938
Asmar, J.-P. El, & Mady, C. (2013). A Constructivist Approach to Design Teaching at the Postgraduate Level: The Case of an Interdisciplinary Design Programme at FAAD, NDU, Lebanon. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.234
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023, July 8). Listrik yang Didistribusikan Menurut Provinsi (GWh) (GWh), 2019-2021. Source Url: Https://Www.Bps.Go.Id/Indicator/7/859/1/Listrik-Yang-Didistribusikan-Menurut-Provinsi-Gwh-.Html; Access Time: July 8, 2023, 10:38 Am.
Baker, F. W., & Moukhliss, S. (2020). Concretising Design Thinking: A Content Analysis of Systematic and Extended Literature Reviews on Design Thinking and Human-Centred Design. Review of Education, 8(1), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3186
Basso, A., Chiorri, C., Bracco, F., Carnasciali, M. M., Alloisio, M., & Grotti, M. (2018). Improving the interest of high-school students toward chemistry by crime scene investigation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00232g
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
Beksultanova, A. I., Dzhankhotova, P. M., & Shardan, S. K. (2022). Renewable and alternative energy sources. Green energy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1045(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1045/1/012134
Caughron, J. J., Peterson, D. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Creativity Training. In Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 311–317). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-375038-9.00226-0
Clemente, V., Tschimmel, K., & Vieira, R. (2017). Why a Logbook? A backpack journey as a metaphor for product design education. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1530–S1542. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352677
Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., & Chappell, K. (2013). Possibility thinking: culminative studies of an evidence-based concept driving creativity? Education 3-13, 41(5), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.656671
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Du, K., Wang, Y., Ma, X., Luo, Z., Wang, L., & Shi, B. (2020). Achievement goals and creativity: the mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 40(10), 1249–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1806210
Earle, A. G., & Leyva-de la Hiz, D. I. (2021). The wicked problem of teaching about wicked problems: Design thinking and emerging technologies in sustainability education. Management Learning, 52(5), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620974857
Elfrida, E., Hadinugrahaningsih, T., & Rahmawati, Y. (2017). Studi Pendekatan Dilemmas Stories pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam dengan Metode Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS). JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 7(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.072.02
Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_09
Febriansari, D., . S., & Yamtinah, S. (2023). Construction of the STEAM Learning Model with a Design Thinking Approach on Renewable Energy Materials. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i8.13284
Flores, C. (2018). Problem-based science, a constructionist approach to science literacy in middle school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.001
Foster, N., & Schleicher, A. (2022). Assessing Creative Skills. Creative Education, 13(01), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.131001
Ghufrooni, R., Darwis, Z., & Kurniadewi, F. (2019). Analisis Minat Belajar Kimia Siswa melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E menggunakan Cerita Misteri pada Materi Asam Basa. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 9(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.092.04
Grigorenko, E. L. (2019). Creativity: a challenge for contemporary education. Comparative Education, 55(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1541665
Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2016). Transformation: Constructivism, design thinking, and elementary STEAM. Art Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about Creativity in Science Education. Creative Education, 03(05), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35089
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Henriksen, D. (2017). Creating STEAM with Design Thinking: Beyond STEM and Arts Integration. STEAM, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20170301.11
Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. (2020). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teaching Education, 31(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1531841
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
Hernández-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Rodríguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The effects of using socio-scientific issues and technology in problem-based learning: A systematic review. In Education Sciences (Vol. 11, Issue 10). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640
Hetherington, L., Chappell, K., Ruck Keene, H., Wren, H., Cukurova, M., Hathaway, C., Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. (2020). International educators’ perspectives on the purpose of science education and the relationship between school science and creativity. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1575803
Higgins, J. M. (1994). 101 creative problem solving techniques?: the handbook of new ideas for business. New Management Pub. Co.
Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750
Karaduman, C. ?. (2014). GLOBAL CHALLENGES FOR THE WORLD. https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/Global_Challenges_Policy_Brief_Jan10.pdf
Kaufman, J. C. (2013a). Article in Educational leadership: journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261797704
Kaufman, J. C. (2013b). Article in Educational leadership: journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261797704
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In Praise of Clark Kent: Creative Metacognition and the Importance of Teaching Kids When (Not) to Be Creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.799413
Kaufman, J. C., Simonton, D. K., Kaufman, A. S., Mumford, M. D., Cowles, H. W., Plucker, J., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2009). Creativity 101. Springer.
Kenny, U., Regan, Á., Hearne, D., & O’Meara, C. (2021). Empathising, defining and ideating with the farming community to develop a geotagged photo app for smart devices: A design thinking approach. Agricultural Systems, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103248
Kim, K. H. (2019). Demystifying Creativity: What Creativity Isn’t and Is? Roeper Review, 41(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1585397
Kostrzewski, M. (2018). One design issue–many solutions. Different perspectives of design thinking–case study. International Conference on Knowledge Management …. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_16
Lambert, A. (2019). Developing skills through creative problem-solving. Childhood Education, 95(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2019.1638709
Lee, J. H. (2022). Building creative confidence through an interdisciplinary creativity course: Changes in creative challenges and creative personal identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(3), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1835689
Lim, B. K. (2014). The Theme Park Experience of Teaching Science from the Constructivist Paradigm. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1392
Maharani, K., Mahtari, S., & Suyidno, S. (2021). Improving Scientific Creativity and Scientific Attitude of Students through Creative Responsibility Based Learning on Energy-Work Materials during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Prisma Sains?: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 9(2), 325. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v9i2.4386
Malele, V., & Ramaboka, M. E. (2020). The Design Thinking Approach to students STEAM projects. Procedia CIRP, 91, 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.100
Mardiah, A., Khairi, F., Harun, C., Hadiana, D., & Nasional, I. (2022). Transferable skills for pre-service chemistry teachers in Indonesia: Applying a design thinking-STEAM-PjBL model. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366323543
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Qualitative Data Analysis (M. B. Miles (ed.); Third).
Murphy, E. (1997). Constructivism: From Philosophy to Practice.
Natalya, E., Rahmawati, Y., & Erdawati, E. (2021). Integration dilemmas stories in STEAM project of colloid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012046
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2010). Design thinking: understand–improve–apply. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LAbIwOwHz1MC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=design+thinking+in+learning&ots=2Ol8nB1SpH&sig=TDlbpyY23lcE75X3bI3sG9avalQ
Rahayu, I. D., Permanasari, A., & Heliawati, L. (2022). The Effectiveness of Socioscientific Issue-Based Petroleum Materials Integrated with The Elsmawar Website on Students’ Scientific Literacy. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(2), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.118
Rahayu, S. (2019). Socio-scientific Issues (SSI) in Chemistry Education: Enhancing Both Students’ Chemical Literacy & Transferable Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012008
Rahayu, S., Astarina, A. D., Setyaningsih, A., & Noor Fathi, M. (2018). High school students’ attitudes about socioscientific issues contextualized in inquiry-based chemistry instruction. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206129.3239436
Rahmawati, Y., & Nurbaity, M. (2014). CE-16 ENGAGING STUDENTS IN SOCIAL EMOTIONAL LEARNING: THE ROLE OF DILEMMA STORIES IN CHEMISTRY LEARNING.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sari, R. M., & Wiyarsi, A. (2021). Inquiry Learning Using Local Socio-Scientific Issues as Context to Improve Students’ Chemical Literacy.
Stanford, J., Siminoff, E. T., O’Neill, M., & Mailhot, J. (2017). What is design thinking? matthewemay.com. https://matthewemay.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Innovation2018.pdf
Susan M.Brookhart. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. ASCD.
Wolcott, M. D., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2020a). Promoting creative problem-solving in schools of pharmacy with the use of design thinking. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(10), 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8065
Wolcott, M. D., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2020b). Promoting creative problem-solving in schools of pharmacy with the use of design thinking. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://www.ajpe.org/content/84/10/ajpe8065.abstract
Wolcott, M. D., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2020c). Promoting creative problem-solving in schools of pharmacy with the use of design thinking. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(10), 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8065
Yalç?n, V., & Erden, ?. (2021). The Effect of STEM Activities Prepared According to the Design Thinking Model on Preschool Children’s Creativity and Problem-Solving Skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100864
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rifqi Ghufrooni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
