THE EFFECT OF USING MONTESSORI METHOD AND DEMONSTRATION METHOD ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PRONUNCIATION AT PRIMARY 1 STUDENTS OF NAKAMURA SCHOOL MEDAN

Authors

  • Susanti Susanti Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v6i3.18591

Keywords:

Pronunciation, Montessori Method, Demonstration Method.

Abstract

Pronunciation is one of important aspects in English and one of the necessary components of oral communication. The purpose of this research is to find out Montessori Method and Demonstration Method effect on students’ Achievement in Pronunciation at Nakamura School. The method of this research based on experimental quantitative research doing with using a number, statistics process and structure. The population of this research will use to the primary 1 students of Nakamura School Medan. The writer used simple Random Sampling that is subset of individuals 9 a sample (chosen from a larger set 9 a population), each individual is chosen randomly and entirely. After collecting and analyzing the data, it was found that the lowest score of pre-test in experimental group was 20 and the highest score was 40 and the mean of pre-test was 30.00 and  after administrated the method of Montessori method, the researcher found the lowest  score of students’ pronunciation was 40 and the highest score was 80 and the mean of post-test was 61.43. It means that there was 20 (40-20) difference of the lowest score in pre-test and post-test. The mean score of the pre-test was 30.00, and the post-test is 61.43 (61.43 – 30.00 = 31.43). It can be concluded that the students’ scores in pre-test of experimental group was smaller than post-test, which was using Montessori method. The lowest score of pre-test in experimental group by Demonstration method was 10 and the highest score was 30, and the mean of pre-test was 22.86. After post-test was administered, the lowest score in experimental group was 50 and the  and the highest was 80 and the mean of post-test was 61.43. The lowest score significantly improved. It means that the difference of the score was 50 (100-50). It also happened to the highest score, 80 improved to 100 (100-80 = 20). It means that the difference of the score was 30. The mean of pre-test was 22.86 and post-test was 61.43 (61.43- 22.86= 38.27). It can be concluded that the students’ score in the experimental group which was taught by applying Montessori method was significantly different and the students’ score in pre-test of experimental group was smaller than post-test , which was Demonstration method.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Celce-Murcia (1996). Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages

Dalton, E. (1998). Teaching Pronunciation. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Hainstock, E (2008). Kenapa Montessori?. Jakarta: Mitra – Media

Harmer, J (2000). The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: Pearson Education Limited, 2001

Hornby, A.S.(1995). Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary.Great Britain : Oxford University Press

Jack C. Richards and Theodore S. Rodgers (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge Language Teaching Library

James, R. B. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation Gets a Bad R.A.P: A Framework for Teaching Pronunciation. Hankuk: University of Foreign Studies

Heaton, J. B. (1990). Classroom Testing. London: Longman.

Jones (1958). The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge University Press

Kenworthy, J. (1990). Teaching English Pronunciation. Harlow: Longman

Kelly, G. (2000). How to Teach Pronunciation. London: Pearson Education Limited

Khotari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology. New Delhi: New Age International

Lado, R. (1964). Language Teaching: A Scientific Approach. New York: McGrow-Hill Inc

Madsen, S Harold. 1983. Techniques in Testing. England: Oxford American English (University Press).

Morgan, Barton, et al. (1976). Method in Adult Education (3rd Ed). Danville: The Interstate Printers & Publisher, Inc

Muflihah Isnawati. (2014) Faktor Risiko Kejadian Stunting Pada Balita Usia 12 Bulan Di Desapurwokerto Kecamatan Patebon, Kabupaten Kendal. Artikel Ilmiah, Universitas Diponegoro

Naim, Ngainun (2012) Character Buliding Optimalisasi Peran Pendidikan dalam Pengembangan Ilmu & Pembentukan Karakter bangsa. Jogjakarta : ArRuzz Media.

Nunan. (2001).Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy 2ndedition.New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

____(2005). Pactical English Language Teaching : Young Learners. McGraw-hill Companies, Inc

____(2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. USA: Longman

Nurhayati, Eti. 2011. Psikologi Pendidikan Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Paulston, C. B., & Bruder, M. N. (1976). Teaching English as a second language:

Techniques and procedures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishers

Smith, A. H., & Morse, E. E. (1979). The Marga Pleurotus in the Western United States.

Iowa: W. M. C Brown Company Publisher Dubuqui.

Sugiono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung. Penerbit Alfabeta Bandung

Weir, Cyril, J. (1990). Communicative Language Testing. Prentice Hall International.

Yule, G. (2006). The study of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Downloads

Published

2023-09-15

How to Cite

Susanti, S. (2023). THE EFFECT OF USING MONTESSORI METHOD AND DEMONSTRATION METHOD ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PRONUNCIATION AT PRIMARY 1 STUDENTS OF NAKAMURA SCHOOL MEDAN. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 6(3), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v6i3.18591