METODE PHYSIOEX®️ DAN KOMBINASI DENGAN KONVENSIONAL DALAM PRAKTIKUM FISIOLOGI RESPIRASI MAHASISWA KEDOKTERAN : SUATU PERBANDINGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/prepotif.v10i1.54495Keywords:
fisiologi respirasi, physioex®, praktikumAbstract
Penguasaan praktikum fisiologi respirasi sangat penting bagi mahasiswa kedokteran karena berhubungan langsung dengan pemahaman fungsi vital sistem pernapasan. Laboratorium virtual PhysioEx® telah digunakan sebagai media utama praktikum, namun hasil evaluasi menunjukkan tingkat kelulusan dan rata-rata nilai praktikum masih rendah. Praktikum konvensional memberikan penjelasan konseptual dam pengalaman langsung dalam pengukuran parameter fisiologis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi metode pembelajaran praktikum fisiologi respirasi yang lebih efektif, dengan membandingkan penggunaan PhysioEx® saja dengan kombinasi praktikum konvensional dan PhysioEx® pada mahasiswa kedokteran Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Penelitian menggunakan rancangan true experimental dengan desain pretest–posttest control group pada 58 mahasiswa yang dibagi secara acak menjadi kelompok kontrol dan kelompok perlakuan. Penguasaan praktikum diukur menggunakan tes pilihan ganda pretest dan posttest. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan dengan uji paired t-test, Wilcoxon, independent t-test, dan Mann–Whitney U sesuai hasil uji normalitas. Kedua kelompok menunjukkan peningkatan skor yang signifikan antara pretest dan posttest, menunjukkan bahwa baik PhysioEx® tunggal maupun kombinasi metode mampu meningkatkan penguasaan praktikum. Namun, uji perbandingan antar kelompok pada nilai posttest menunjukkan perbedaan yang bermakna secara statistik (p < 0,05). Kombinasi praktikum konvensional dan PhysioEx® lebih efektif dibandingkan penggunaan PhysioEx® saja dalam meningkatkan penguasaan praktikum fisiologi respirasi mahasiswa kedokteran.References
Ariana, R. (2016). Introduction to human physiology (International ed., pp. 1–23).
Bakar, A., Haryanto, H., Afrida, A., & Sanova, A. (2020). Implementasi pembelajaran sains kimia berbasis eksperimen menggunakan aplikasi virtual lab authoring tool ChemCollective. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Pinang Masak, 1(2), 40–47
Flegr, S., Kuhn, J., & Scheiter, K. (2023). When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Combining real and virtual experiments in science education. Computers & Education, 197, 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104745
Iqbal, T. (2019). Doctors’ training in a medical physiology laboratory. 15(3), 1–2.
Kurniawan, A. M., Maulana, N. M., Argarini, R., Putri, E. A. C., & Rimbun, D. (2023). Physiology education in the Indonesian medical curriculum: Current progress and future perspective. International Journal of Research Publications, 140(1), 206–213.
Moya-Salazar, J. (2019). Limitations and perspectives of the physiology laboratory PhysioEx V9.1 during single-center Peruvian medical education. 4, 1–6.
Mulia, S., & Murni, S. (2022). Implikasi pembelajaran praktikum ilmu pengetahuan alam dalam kemajuan kognitif siswa. SEARCH: Science Education Research Journal, 1(1), 1. https://e-jurnal.iainsorong.ac.id/index.php/jaser
Prastiwi, D., Lestari, W., Utami, R. T., Rinarto, N. D., Chabibah, N., Fitriyani, N. L., et al. (2023). Pengantar biomedik: Panduan komprehensif (Vol. 1, pp. 1–23).
Puluhulawa, T. G., Pateda, S. M., Abbas, J. N. I., & Paramata, N. R. (2024). The efficiency of utilizing the PhysioEx® application through e-learning among students in the field of health at Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. 3, 62–72.
Saleh, F. M., Riandi, R., & Surtikanti, H. K. (2024). Laboratorium konvensional vs laboratorium virtual dalam efektivitas dan motivasi pembelajaran biologi: Studi literatur. Jurnal Jeumpa, 11(1), 13–24.
Tufts, M. A., & Higgins-Opitz, S. B. (2025). What makes the learning of physiology in a PBL medical curriculum challenging? Student perceptions. 187–195.
Widayat, E., Ardianik, & Kadar, S. (2019). Indeks prestasi mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Dr. Soetomo ditinjau dari asal daerah. 4(2), 147–162.
Wörner, S., & Scheiter, K. (2022). The best of two worlds: A systematic review on combining real and virtual experiments in science education. 92(6), 911–952.
Yih, Y., Hui, K., Er, M., & Devi, V. (2021). An analysis of health science students’ preparedness and perception of interactive virtual laboratory simulation. Medical Science Educator, 1919–1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01364-1
Zante, B., Hautz, W. E., & Schefold, J. C. (2020). Physiology education for intensive care medicine residents: A 15-minute interactive peer-led flipped classroom session. PLoS ONE, 15(1), 1–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Devi Aulia Putri Nurindah Rahman, Sri Manovita Pateda, Sefry M. Pantow, Muhamad Nur Syukriani Yusuf, Edwina Rugaiah Monayo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
