THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GREATER AURICULAR NERVE (GAN) BLOCK USING ISOBARIC ROPIVACAINE AS AN ANALGESIC ADJUVANT AS COMPARED TO INTRAVENOUS OPIOID AS ANALGESIA FOR MIDDLE EAR SURGERY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/prepotif.v8i1.27255Keywords:
Blok Saraf Aurikular Besar, Intensitas Nyeri, Ropivakain Isobarik, Stabilitas Hemodinamik, Telinga Bagian Tengah-DalamAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai efektivitas Blok Saraf Aurikular Besar menggunakan ropivakain isobarik terhadap jumlah penggunaan opioid selama dan setelah operasi, penilaian hemodinamik, intensitas nyeri, dan penilaian respons mual dan muntah post-operatif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimental murni (eksperimental sejati). Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah uji acak terkontrol buta tunggal (RCT). Jumlah subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 48 pasien berusia di atas 18 tahun hingga 65 tahun yang menjalani operasi telinga bagian tengah-bagian dalam di Rumah Sakit Prof IGNG Ngoerah, Denpasar. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan SPSS versi 26 untuk uji t-tidak tergantung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa fentanyl P1 adalah 77,08 ± 32,90 mg dan P0 adalah 97,92 ± 37,53 mg, p = 0,003. Kebutuhan morfin ditemukan dalam 3 jam, P1 adalah 0,58 ± 0,77 mg dan P0 ditemukan menjadi 1,04 ± 0,69 mg, p < 0,001. Kebutuhan morfin 6 P1 adalah 0,79 ± 0,72 mg dan P0 ditemukan menjadi 2,63 ± 1,27 mg, p < 0,001. Kebutuhan morfin selama 24 jam P1 adalah 1,50 ± 1,14 mg dan P0 ditemukan menjadi 3,92 ± 1,66 mg, p < 0,001. Intensitas nyeri ditemukan lebih rendah pada 3, 6, 12, 18, dan 24 jam pada P1 (p <0,05). Perbaikan hemodinamik > 20% pada P0 ditemukan pada 15, 30, 60, dan 120 menit, sedangkan kelompok P1 ditemukan stabil (p <0,001). Skor mual dan muntah selama 24 jam P1 adalah 1,92 ± 1,01 dan P0 adalah 2,75 ± 1,03, p = 0,007.References
Ellison, M. B., Howell, S., Heiraty, P., Wilson, C., Shepherd, J., & Ellison, P. R. (2020). A Novel Approach to Postoperative Ear Pain—Greater Auricular Nerve Block Catheter: A Case Report. A&A Practice, 14(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001134
Kementerian Kesehatan. (2020). Laporan Kinerja RS Sardjito Tahun 2020.
Liu, J., Yuan, K., Zhou, H., Li, L., Wang, G., & Li, T. (2020). A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery. BMC Anesthesiology, 20(1), 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01155-y
Nieman, C. L., & Oh, E. S. (2020). Hearing Loss. Annals of Internal Medicine, 173(11), ITC81–ITC96. https://doi.org/10.7326/AITC202012010
Ökmen, K., & Metin Ökmen, B. (2018). Ultrasound guided superficial cervical plexus block versus greater auricular nerve block for postoperative tympanomastoid surgery pain: A prospective, randomized, single blind study. Agri, 30(4), 171–178.
Ritchie, M. K., Wilson, C. A., Grose, B. W., Ranganathan, P., Howell, S. M., & Ellison, M. B. (2016). Ultrasound-Guided Greater Auricular Nerve Block as Sole Anesthetic for Ear Surgery. Clinics and Practice, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4081/cp.2016.856
Sadikovna, R. K. (2022). Hearing-speech rehabilitation of children with cochlear implants as a socio-pedagogical problem. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 11(11), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2278-4853.2022.00276.2
Thallaj, A., Marhofer, P., Moriggl, B., Delvi, B. M., Kettner, S. C., & Almajed, M. (2010). Great auricular nerve blockade using high resolution ultrasound: A volunteer study. Anaesthesia, 65(8), 836–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06443.x
Wu, P., O’Malley, J. T., Gruttola, V. de, & Liberman, M. C. (2020). Age-Related Hearing Loss Is Dominated by Damage to Inner Ear Sensory Cells, Not the Cellular Battery That Powers Them. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(33), 6357–6366. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0937-20.2020
Yan, F., Desiato, V. M., Nguyen, S. A., & Lentsch, E. J. (2021). Impact of greater auricular nerve sacrifice during parotidectomy on quality of life. Head & Neck, 43(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26452
Yang, H.-M., Kim, H.-J., & Hu, K.-S. (2015). Anatomic and histological study of great auricular nerve and its clinical implication. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 68(2), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.030
Yang, H.-M., Won, S.-Y., Kim, H.-J., & Hu, K.-S. (2013). Sihler staining study of anastomosis between the facial and trigeminal nerves in the ocular area and its clinical implications. Muscle & Nerve, 48(4), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23875
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ian Tirta, I Made Gede Widnyana, Cynthia Dewi Sinardja, Kadek Agus Heryana Putra, Pontisomaya Parami, I Putu Pramana Suarjaya, Made Wiryana, Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).