Biosafety Level at the Microbiology Laboratory of PT SCI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/prepotif.v5i2.1747Keywords:
biological hazard, biosafety, laboratory, microbiology, risk assessmentAbstract
Introduction: Protection of personnel in microbiological testing laboratories should be conducted. One of the efforts that can be used for preventive action is the determination of the biosafety level. This study was conducted with the aim of knowing how important the biosafety level is seen from the readiness level of laboratory personnel regarding knowledge, training, and competency assessment of laboratory personnel. Moreover, this study was also based on the application of biological risk assessment and the planned biosafety implementation program. Method: The sampling method used was secondary data with document review and data recording from the implementation of activities in the microbiology laboratory. Meanwhile, the primary data collection was done through in-depth interviews with respondents using questionnaires and direct interviews. Result: The results of data collection and data processing showed that 74% of laboratory personnel had the appropriate competence in carrying out the assessment by determining the biosafety level. This was supported by the biosafety program which might be planned and implemented with laboratory readiness. This had a percentage of 73% in terms of biological risk assessment and laboratory facilities. Conclusion: Determination of biosafety level is important for personnel who is working in dangerous facilities which is exposed to microbiological agents such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and other microbiological products. This is because, determining the biosafety level not only protects laboratory personnel, but also the environment from biological hazards.References
Ahmad, S. et al. (2019) ‘A Survey on Biosafety Practices in Lab Personnel in 12 Selected Areas of Karachi, Pakistan’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 68–72.
Bayot, M. L. and Limaiem, F. (2019) ‘Biosafety Guidelines’, StatPearls, (January).
Crane, L. et al. (2013) ‘Introduction to Risk Management: Understanding Agricultural Risk’, p. 39.
Feng, X. et al. (2019) ‘Aerosol containment by airflow in biosafety laboratories’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 63–67.
Hastono, S. P. (2018) Analisis Data Pada Bidang Kesehatan. Depok: PT RajaGRafindo Persada.
Health and Safety Authority (2016) A Guide to Risk Assessment and Safety Statements, Health and Safety Authority.
Hou, M. et al. (2019) ‘Quality management in a high-containment laboratory’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 34–38.
Huang, Y. et al. (2019) ‘Networking for training Level 3/4 biosafety laboratory staff’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 46–49.
Jiang, M., Liu, B. and Wei, Q. (2019) ‘Pathogenic microorganism biobanking in China’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 31–33.
Li, N. et al. (2019) ‘Biosafety laboratory risk assessment’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(2), pp. 90–92.
Nayeem, A. (2016) ‘Book on Microbiology Laboratory’, (February 2001), pp. 1–168.
OSHC (2003) ‘Biological Hazards – Prevention and Personal Protection’, pp. 4–16.
Pigłowski, M. (2019) ‘Pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms in the rapid alert system for food and feed’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3).
Public Health Agency of Canada (2018) Canadian Biosafety Guideline – Pathogen Risk Assessment.
Rim, K. T. and Lim, C. H. (2014) ‘Biologically hazardous agents at work and efforts to protect workers’ health: A review of recent reports’, Safety and Health at Work, 5(2), pp. 43–52.
Sabri, L. and Hastono, S. P. (2014) Statistik Kesehatan. Jakarta: PT RajaGRafindo Persada.
Shroder, J. F. (2016) Hazards and Disasters Series Biological and Environmental Hazards , Risks , and Disasters.
Smith, R. L. (2014) ‘Risk Assessment: Technical Guidance Manual’, Laboratory Biosafety and Biosecurity Risk Assessment Technical Guidance Document, pp. 1–51.
Syahputra, G. (2017) ‘Biosafety dan biosecurity: upaya untuk aman bekerja di laboratorium’, BioTrends, 8(1), pp. 34–38.
Traynor, P. L., Frederick, R. and Koch, M. (2002) Biosafety and Risk Assessment in Agricultural Biotechnology. A workbook for training in Biosafety Assessment.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health (2020) ‘Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories’, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 6th Edition, pp. 1–250.
W, F. et al. (2019) ‘Studies on developing a safe-management standard system for Chinese biosafety laboratories’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 39–45.
WHO (2004) ‘Laboratory biosafety manual Third edition World Health Organization’, World Health Organization, pp. 1–178.
Zhang, Z. et al. (2019) ‘Research and development of airtight biosafety containment facility for stainless steel structures’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 56–62.
Zhou, D. et al. (2019) ‘Biosafety and biosecurity’, Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 1(1), pp. 15–18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Aulia Jauhari Rakhman, Sjahrul Meizar Nasri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).