Analisis Perbandingan Sifat Mekanik Sambungan Kampuh V Terhadap Kampuh U Hasil Pengelasan SMAW Menggunakan Posisi 3G pada Baja St 37

Rizky Maulana; Afdal Afdal; Risal   Abu; Mukhnizar Mukhnizar; Veny  Selviyanty

doi:10.31004/jutin.v7i1.25625

Authors

Rizky Maulana Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Ekasakti
Afdal Afdal Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Ekasakti
Risal Abu Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Ekasakti
Mukhnizar Mukhnizar Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Ekasakti
Veny Selviyanty Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Ekasakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jutin.v7i1.25625

Keywords:

Weld seam V Connection, weld seam U Connection, 3G, SMAW

Abstract

Selection of the type of support that is appropriate to the load will affect the mechanical and physical properties. Using a good type of support and in accordance with welding procedures can have an influence on the welding results (weldability properties). The comparison of the mechanical properties of V-joints to U-joints is that the maximum tensile stress value between V-joints and U-joints is a maximum of 477.17 N/mm2, while the maximum tensile stress value of V-joints is 453.12 N/mm2. The strain value between the V seam connection and the U seam connection is 20%, while the strain value for the V seam connection is 30%. The yield stress value between the V seam joint and the U seam joint is found in the U seam joint with a yield stress value of 356.05 N/mm2, while the yield stress value for the V seam joint is 337.6 N/mm2. The modulus of elasticity value between the V seam connection and the U seam connection is 2,518.09 N/mm2, while the modulus of elasticity value for the V seam connection is 1,529.43 N/mm2.

References

Afan, M. Bin, Purwantono, P., Mulianti, M., & Rahim, B. (2020). Pengaruh Suhu Penyimpanan Elektroda Low Hydrogen E7016 terhadap Hasil Uji Tekuk Sambungan Las Pelat Baja Karbon SS400. Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin,15(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v15i1.1823

Afriany, R., & Husni, T, 2016. Analisa Perbandingan Las TIG dan Las SMAW terhadap Kekuatan Tarik dan Kekerasan Stainlees Steel 304. 8(2), 189–20.

American Welding Society, Certification Manual for Welding Inspectors,, AWS, Florida, 2010

Arifin, A., & Hendrianto, M, 2018. MENGGUNAKAN SMAW Amir Arifin , M Hendrianto. Jurnal Teknik Mesin UNTIRTA, IV(1), 20–25.

Bintoro, G.A. Dasar-Dasar pekerjaan las. Kanisius. Yogyakarta,2000

Daryanto, 2010. Proses Pengolahan Besi dan Baja (Ilmu Metalurgi), Bandung: Sarana Tutorial Nurani Sejahtera.

Dowling E, Norman. Mechanical Behavior Of Materials. 2^ndadition. Printed in the united states of America, 1999

Groover, Mikell P. Fundamental Of Modern Mamufacturing Material, Proses And System. Penerbit Prentice-Hall Inc. USA, 1996.

Helanianto, H., Epriyandi, E., & Rahmadi, H, 2020. Pengaruh Variasi Arus Pengelasan Smaw Terhadap Kekerasan Logam Induk Dan Logam Las. Elemen : Jurnal Teknik Mesin, 7(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.34128/je.v7i2.148

Huda, M., & Setiawan, F. (2016). Pengaruh Variasi Sudut Kampuh V dan Kuat Arus dengan Las Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) pada Baja A36 Terhadap Sifat Mekanik. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Mesin, 1–9.

Kurniawan, A. S., Solichin, & Puspitasari, R. P. (2014). Analisis Kekuatan Tarik Dan Struktur Mikro PadaBaja St.41 Akibat Perbedaan Ayunan Elektroda Pengelasan SMAW. Jurnal Teknik Mesin, 22(2), 1–12.

Santoso, Joko.Pengaruh Arus Pengelasan.UNNES TM FT.2006

Shiddiq, M., Fernanda, Y., Mesin, D. T., Teknik, F., Padang, U. N., Tawar, K. A., & Baja, K. B, 2022. Analisa Perbandingan Hasil Pengelasan Las Smaw Dengan Las Mig Pada Posisi 3G Dengan Material Jis G3101 Ss400. 4(3), 55–61

Suharto,Suteja.kampuh pengelasan.Universitas Sebelas Maret.1991.

Soetardjo, 1997. Teknologi Pengelasan Logam, Rineka Cipta , Jakarta