MEMAHAMI PENERIMAAN DALAM KEDUKAAN: KEDUKAAN DAN KETERJERATAN KOGNITIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/prepotif.v6i3.8147Keywords:
Penerimaan, Jerat Kognitif, Gejala Complicated GriefAbstract
Kedukaan dapat muncul setelah kehilangan orang yang dicintai. Terlepas dari rasa sakit akibat kehilangan, pandemi COVID-19 telah membatasi orang-orang dari melakukan ritual berduka yang biasanya dilakukan. Ditambah lagi, pengaruh COVID-19 yang berdampak ke kehidupan individu yang lebih luas sehingga, menghasilkan berbagai tekanan dalam kehidupan individu. Hal ini dapat menjadikan respons kedukaan yang dialami oleh seseorang menjadi lebih kompleks dan menghasilkan complicated grief. Salah satu faktor yang diduga memiliki kaitan dengan complicated grief yaitu adanya jerat kognitif. Namun, belum terdapat penelitian yang melihat bagaimana hubungan antara jerat kognitif dan kedukaan. Variabel yang diduga memiliki kaitan erat dengan keduanya adalah tingkat penerimaan akan pikiran dan emosi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara jerat kognitif dengan gejala complicated grief yang dimediasi oleh tingkat penerimaan pada dewasa muda yang mengalami kehilangan akibat kematian. Studi kuantitatif kepada partisipan dewasa muda dilakukan dan dianalisis menggunakan analisis mediasi. Gejala complicated grief diukur dengan Complicated Grief Inventory (CGI), jeratan kognitif diukur dengan Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) dan penerimaan diukur melalui Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II (AAQ-II). Dari 107 partisipan, penerimaan memediasi secara penuh hubungan antara jerat kognitif dengan gejala complicated grief (ab = .53, p < 0.001; 95% CI [.15, .89]. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa cognitive fusion dapat memprediksi gejala complicated grief dengan penurunan tingkat penerimaan terhadap pengalaman internal.References
Baker, A. W., Keshaviah, A., Horenstein, A., Goetter, E. M., Mauro, C., Reynolds, C. F., Zisook, S., Katherine Shear, M., & Simon, N. M. (2016). The Role of Avoidance in Complicated Grief: A Detailed Examination of the Grief-Related Avoidance Questionnaire (GRAQ) in a Large Sample of Individuals with Complicated Grief. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 21(6), 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2016.1157412
Bardeen, J. R., and Fergus, T. A. (2016). The interactive effect of cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance on anxiety, depression, stress and posttraumatic stress symptoms. J. Context. Behav. Sci. 5, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.02.002
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior therapy, 42(4), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Donati, M. A., Berrocal, C., Bernini, O., Gori, C., & Primi, C. (2021). Measuring cognitive fusion through the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-7: Measurement invariance across non-clinical and clinical psychological samples. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0246434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246434
Eisma, M. C., Schut, H. A. W., Stroebe, M. S., van den Bout, J., Stroebe, W., & Boelen, P. A. (2014, August 20). Is Rumination after Bereavement Linked with Loss Avoidance? Evidence from Eye-Tracking. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e104980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104980
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Faustino, B., & Vasco, A. B. (2020). Early maladaptive schemas and cognitive fusion on the regulation of psychological needs. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy: On the Cutting Edge of Modern Developments in Psychotherapy, 50(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-019-09446-3
Fernández-Rodríguez, C., Paz-Caballero, D., González-Fernández, S., & Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2018). Activation vs. experiential avoidance as a transdiagnostic condition of emotional distress: An empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01618
Gillanders, D. T., Bolderston, H., Bond, F. W., Dempster, M., Flaxman, P. E., Campbell, L., Kerr, S., Tansey, L., Noel, P., Ferenbach, C., Masley, S., Roach, L., Lloyd, J., May, L., Clarke, S., & Remington, B. (2014). The Development and Initial Validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behavior Therapy,45(1),83101.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001
Golden, A. M. J., & Dalgleish, T. (2012). Facets of pejorative self-processing in complicated grief. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(3), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027338
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Levin, M. E. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a Unified Model of Behavior Change. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 976–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012460836
Nakajima S. (2018). Complicated grief: recent developments in diagnostic criteria and treatment. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 373(1754), 20170273. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0273
Nam, I. (2015). Suicide Bereavement and Complicated Grief: Experiential Avoidance as a Mediating Mechanism. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 21(4), 325= 334. doi:10.1080/15325024.2015.1067099
O’Loughlin, C. M., Bennett, D. S., & O’Hayer, C. V. (2020). The nomological network of cognitive fusion among people living with HIV: Associations with rumination, shame, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.01.012
Permadi, D., & Nurwianti, F. (2019). Mindfulness and Coping Skills as Predictors of Competitive Anxiety amongst Athletes in Indonesia. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v33i4.1796
Prigerson, H. G., Maciejewski, P. K., Reynolds, C. F., 3rd, Bierhals, A. J., Newsom, J. T., Fasiczka, A., Frank, E., Doman, J., & Miller, M. (1995). Inventory of Complicated Grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry research, 59(1-2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2
Romero-Moreno, R., Márquez-González, M., Losada, A., Gillanders, D., & Fernández-Fernández, V. (2014). Cognitive fusion in dementia caregiving: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the “Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire”. Behavioral Psychology, 22(1), 117–132.
Shear, M. K. (2012). Grief and mourning gone awry: pathway and course of complicated grief. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2012.14.2/mshear
Shear, M. K. (2015). Complicated Grief. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp1315618
Thomas, K. N., & Bardeen, J. R. (2020). The buffering effect of attentional control on the relationship between cognitive fusion and anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 132, 103653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2020.103653
Xiong A, Lai X, Wu S, Yuan X, Tang J, Chen J, Liu Y and Hu M (2021) Relationship Between Cognitive Fusion, Experiential Avoidance, and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms in Patients With Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder. Front. Psychol. 12:655154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655154
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Renata Ratnasari, Imelda Ika Dian Oriza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
