Systematic Review of Research Instruments Measuring Competence of Nursing Clinical Preceptors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jn.v9i2.42037Abstract
Clinical preceptors are essential to nursing education because they help students learn clinical skills and develop as professionals. However, assessing preceptor competency can be challenging due to the lack of standardized and reliable tools. While various tools are available to measure multiple aspects of competency, there is no clear agreement on how these tools should be selected or used across clinical settings. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate tools measuring competence of nursing clinical preceptor. The review focused on the instruments and their psychometric qualities, how they are used, and how effective they are in improving clinical education. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify existing instruments used to measure the level of competency of nursing clinical preceptors. Science Direct, Google Scholar, Sage Journal, Pubmed, and Springer were the databases selected for this study. Of the 13 eligible articles in this study, 12 different instruments were found. The instruments found included the Clinical Educators' Competence Questionnaire, Clinical Teaching Competence Inventory, Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ), Preceptors Orientation Competence Instrument (POCI), Preceptors' Competency Domain Guide Tool, Clinical Core Competency of Preceptors (CCCP), Clinical Preceptor Experience Evaluation Tool (CPEET), Competence of Clinical Nurse Educators Instrument, Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness Inventory (NCTEI), Mentors' Competence Instrument (MCI), Mentorship Effectiveness Scale, IMSOC Questionnaire. Although there are several tools available to evaluate nursing clinical preceptor competency, each has its advantages and disadvantages, according to the review's findings. For a thorough evaluation, the suitable instruments must be chosen depending on particular educational circumstances. The results show that these instruments need to be further developed and standardized to increase their applicability and reliability in a variety of healthcare settings. This will ultimately assist successful preceptorships and raise the caliber of nursing education.Downloads
Published
2025-02-16
How to Cite
Mansyur, H., Asmaningrum, N., & Wijaya, D. (2025). Systematic Review of Research Instruments Measuring Competence of Nursing Clinical Preceptors. Jurnal Ners, 9(2), 1676–1684. https://doi.org/10.31004/jn.v9i2.42037
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ners

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).