TREND PERAWATAN PRAKONSEPSI PADA PASANGAN YANG AKAN MENIKAH DI INDONESIA : TINJAUAN DESAIN PENELITIAN SAMPAI DENGAN ANALISIS DATA

Authors

  • Yeni Hendriyanti Departemen Keperawatan, Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Alma Ata
  • Arifin Triyanto Departemen Keperawatan Medikal Bedah, Fakultas Kedokteran Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan, Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jkt.v6i3.49122

Keywords:

perawatan prakonsepsi, trend penelitian, calon pengantin

Abstract

Perawatan prakonsepsi merupakan intervensi penting dalam meningkatkan kesehatan ibu dan bayi melalui identifikasi serta pengelolaan risiko sebelum kehamilan. Meskipun memiliki manfaat besar, tingkat partisipasi masyarakat terhadap program ini di Indonesia masih tergolong rendah. Berbagai penelitian telah dilakukan terkait perawatan prakonsepsi, namun belum ada kajian yang secara komprehensif menganalisis tren dan karakteristik penelitian tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi arah penelitian, desain studi, topik utama, serta pendekatan intervensi yang digunakan dalam publikasi mengenai prakonsepsi selama periode 2014 hingga 2025. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis konten terhadap artikel-artikel yang telah dipublikasikan dan terindeks dalam SINTA. Instrumen penelitian mencakup tren jumlah publikasi, pendekatan penelitian, desain penelitian, subjek penelitian, topik utama, instrumen yang digunakan, teknik analisis data, serta rekomendasi yang diberikan dalam studi. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan divisualisasikan dalam bentuk diagram batang. Hasil menunjukkan lonjakan jumlah publikasi pada tahun 2023 sebesar 43,8%. Pendekatan kuantitatif dan desain cross-sectional paling dominan digunakan, sementara pendekatan kualitatif, mixed methods, serta R&D masih jarang diterapkan. Fokus penelitian umumnya pada calon pengantin perempuan, dengan keterlibatan remaja dan kelompok muda yang masih minim. Instrumen utama berupa kuesioner, dan analisis data didominasi oleh metode deskriptif serta uji Wilcoxon. Topik penelitian didominasi dengan topik edukasi prakonsepsi. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya penguatan pendekatan metodologis, perluasan cakupan populasi sasaran, serta pengembangan model layanan prakonsepsi yang lebih kontekstual dan berbasis bukti, guna mendukung strategi promotif dan preventif dalam meningkatkan derajat kesehatan ibu dan anak.

References

Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2019). Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 10(1), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18

Amaje, E., Fikrie, A., & Utura, T. (2022). Utilization of Preconception Care and Its Associated Factors among Pregnant Women of West Guji Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2021: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928221088720

Dean, S. V., Lassi, Z. S., Imam, A. M., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2014). Preconception care: Closing the gap in the continuum of care to accelerate improvements in maternal, newborn and child health. Reproductive Health, 11(Suppl 3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S1

DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057

Ekawati, F. M., Ame, C. G. P., Novitasari, D. A., Marlina, S., Widiantara, I. N. T., & Lau, P. (2025). Get the ball rolling”: Results of a qualitative study to explore the current situation and develop elements essential for optimal preconception care in Indonesian primary care. Midwifery, Volume 144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2025.104339

Fauzi, A., & Pradipta, I. W. (2018). Research methods and data analysis techniques in education articles published by Indonesian biology educational journals. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5889

Ioannides, A. S. (2017). Preconception and prenatal genetic counselling. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.04.003

Jiang, Y., He, X., Lee, M. L. T., Rosner, B., & Yan, J. (2020). Wilcoxon rank-based tests for clustered data with r package clusrank. Journal of Statistical Software, 96(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v096.i06

Khan, N. N., Boyle, J., Lang, A. Y., & Harrison, C. L. (2019). Preconception health attitudes and behaviours of women: A qualitative investigation. Nutrients, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071490

Khekade, H., Potdukhe, A., Taksande, A. B., Wanjari, M. B., & Yelne, S. (2023). Preconception Care: A Strategic Intervention for the Prevention of Neonatal and Birth Disorders. Cureus, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41141

Koo, M., & Yang, S.-W. (2025). Questionnaire Use and Development in Health Research. Encyclopedia, 5(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020065

Kurniawati, W., Afiyanti, Y., Nasution, L. A., & Juliastuti, D. (2023). Preconception care knowledge and information delivery modes among adolescent girls and women: a scoping review. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 29(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2023.02.28

Lim, W. M. (2024). What Is Quantitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622

Mellis, C. M. (2020). How to choose your study design. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 56(7), 1018–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14929

Philip Hurst, S. R. B. (2018). Questionnaires. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.ezproxy.ugm.ac.id/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315158501-10/questionnaires-philip-hurst-stephen-bird

Pyo, J., Lee, W., Choi, E. Y., Jang, S. G., & Ock, M. (2023). Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 56(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.451

Ratcliffe, S. D., Rosener, S. E., & Frayne, D. J. (2022). Preconception Care. Family Medicine: Principles and Practice: Eighth Edition, 4(7), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54441-6_10

Rehermann, B. (2016). Pre-pregnancy counseling and treatment. Nature Publishing Group, 31(15), 2015–2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.227

Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410

Teshome, F., Kebede, Y., Abamecha, F., & Birhanu, Z. (2020). Why do women not prepare for pregnancy? Exploring women’s and health care providers’ views on barriers to uptake of preconception care in Mana District, Southwest Ethiopia: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03208-z

Ukoha, W. C., & Mtshali, N. G. (2022). Preconception care practices among primary health care nurses working in public health facilities in KwaZulu-Natal. Global Health Action, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2112395

Verbiest, S., McClain, E., & Woodward, S. (2016). Advancing preconception health in the United States: strategies for change. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 121(4), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2016.1204395

Vetter, T. R., & Mascha, E. J. (2018). Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(1), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002636

Vishnu Renjith, R. Y., & Noronha2, Judith A.Ladd3, ElissaAGeorge, N. (2021). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM

Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012

Watkins, D. C. (2017). Rapid and Rigorous Qualitative Data Analysis: The “RADaR” Technique for Applied Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917712131

Withanage, N. N., Botfield, J. R., Srinivasan, S., Black, K. I., & Mazza, D. (2022). Effectiveness of preconception interventions in primary care: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice, 72(725), E865–E872. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0040

World Health Organization. (2013). Preconception care Regional expert group consultation. Neththanjali Mapitigama, Case Study, Sri Lanka, 33–35.

Zaçe, D., Orfino, A., Viteritti, A. M., Versace, V., Ricciardi, W., & Di Pietro, M. L. (2022). A comprehensive assessment of preconception health needs and interventions regarding women of childbearing age: a systematic review. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 63(1), E174–E199. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.1.2391

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28