ANALISIS PENERIMAAN PENGGUNA TERHADAP MANAGEMENT LEARNING SYSTEM VILEP BERBASIS M-LEARNING PADA MAHASISWA JURUSAN GIZI DI POLITEKNIK KESEHATAN PALANGKA RAYA

Authors

  • Juni Ramadhani Jurusan Gizi Poltekkes Kemenkes Palangka Raya
  • Ni Wayan Purnawati Jurusan Gizi Poltekkes Kemenkes Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jkt.v2i2.1786

Keywords:

manajemen , learning sistem

Abstract

Absract – M-Learning (Mobile Learning) can be defined as mobile learning media using mobile devices in universities. The Indonesian Ministry of Health in the field of Center for Health Human Resources Education provides a Learning Management System (LMS), a new learning system using technology for students in the health sector. Likewise, in the Department of Nutrition, Health Polytechnic of Ministry of Health, Palangkaraya, also implements the Virtual Learning Program (VILEP) for teachers and students. This study examined the significance of the effect of student admission from Health Polytechnic of Ministry of Health Palangkaraya by of mobile-based VILEP. This study used a research model to describe the relationship between several variables that affect the acceptance of mobile learning as a new innovation at the Palangkaraya Health Polytechnic. For this reason, this study adopted and modified the model of The Uniï¬ed Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) from Mahande and Malago (2016) and acceptance M-Learning as an extended UTAUT variable to determine the influenced factors of M-Learning VILEP acceptance of M-Learning VILEP as a new innovation at the Health Polytechnic of Ministry of Health Palangkaraya. Based on the evaluation results of VILEP M-Learning acceptance model, Effort Expectancy (EF), and Facilitating Condition (FC) have a significant effect on Behavioral Intention (BI), while Behavioral Intention (BI) and Facilitating Condition (FC) have a significant effect on acceptance. M-Learning (MA) VILEP. Students have easy access to VILEP system, supported by the infrastructure of the institution. The main intention and infrastructure encourage students to use VILEP as a learning tool. Keywords: M-Learning (Mobile Learning), Virtual Learning Program (VILEP), The Uniï¬ed Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model.

References

Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M. and Shaalan, K. (2016) ‘Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education’, Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier Ltd, 56, pp. 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033.

Aldosari, B. et al. (2012) ‘User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in a Saudi Arabian hospital radiology department’, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12(1), p. 44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-44.

Ali, R. A. and Arshad, M. R. M. (2016) ‘Perspectives of Students’ Behavior Towards Mobile Learning (M-learning) in Egypt: an Extension of the UTAUT Model’, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 6(4), pp. 1109–1114. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.60992.

Ali, R. A. and Mohd Arshad, M. R. (2018) ‘Empirical analysis on factors impacting on intention to use M-learning in basic education in Egypt’, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(2), pp. 253–270. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3510.

Alrasheedi, M., Capretz, L. F. and Raza, A. (2015) ‘A systematic review of the critical factors for success of mobile learning in higher education (university students’ perspective)’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), pp. 257–276. doi: 10.1177/0735633115571928.

Althunibat, A. (2015) ‘Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education’, Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier Ltd, 52, pp. 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046.

Basak, S. K., Wotto, M. and Bélanger, P. (2018) ‘University Students’ M-learning Adaption Behavioral Factors : A Pilot Study’, 2018 IEEE 9th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON). IEEE, pp. 68–73.

Briz-Ponce, L. et al. (2016) ‘Effects of Mobile Learning in Medical Education: A Counterfactual Evaluation’, Journal of Medical Systems. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(6). doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0487-4.

Briz-Ponce, L. et al. (2017) ‘Learning with mobile technologies – Students’ behavior’, Computers in Human Behavior, 72, pp. 612–620. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027.

Chase, T. J. G. et al. (2018) ‘Mobile learning in medicine: An evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students’, BMC Medical Education. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1264-5.

Chavoshi, A. and Hamidi, H. (2019) ‘Social, individual, technological and pedagogical factors influencing mobile learning acceptance in higher education: A case from Iran’, Telematics and Informatics. Elsevier Ltd, 38, pp. 133–165. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.007.

Chung, H.-H., Chen, S.-C. and Kuo, M.-H. (2015) ‘A Study of EFL College Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., 176, pp. 333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.479.

Dang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. G. and Morgan, J. (2017) ‘Integrating switching costs to information systems adoption: An empirical study on learning management systems’, Information Systems Frontiers. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), pp. 625–644. doi: 10.1007/s10796-015-9618-6.

Dirin, A. and Nieminen, M. (2017) ‘User Experience Evolution of M-Learning Applications’, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, (April), pp. 154–161. doi: 10.5220/0006370301540161.

Domingo, M. G. and Garganté, A. B. (2016) ‘Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers’ perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications’ use in the classroom’, Computers in Human Behavior, 56, pp. 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.023.

El-Masri, M. and Tarhini, A. (2017) ‘Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2)’, Educational Technology Research and Development. Springer US, 65(3), pp. 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8.

Fatria, A. E. and Christantyawati, N. (2018) ‘Pergeseran Merek Smartphone di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Postmodernisme’, Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 2(2), pp. 256–277. doi: 10.25139/jsk.v2i2.379.

Han, I. and Shin, W. S. (2016) ‘The use of a mobile learning management system and academic achievement of online students’, Computers and Education. Elsevier Ltd, 102, pp. 79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.003.

Iqbal, S. and Bhatti, Z. A. (2015) ‘An Investigation of University Student Readiness towards M-learning using Technology Acceptance Model’, 16(4), pp. 83–104.

Jawad, H. H. M. and Hassan, Z. Bin (2015) ‘Applying UTAUT to evaluate the acceptance of mobile learning in higher education in Iraq’, International Journal of Science and Research, 4(5), pp. 2013–2015. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.10.015.

Khan, A. I. et al. (2015) ‘Mobile Learning (M-Learning) adoption in the Middle East: Lessons learned from the educationally advanced countries’, Telematics and Informatics. Elsevier Ltd, 32(4), pp. 909–920. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.005.

Kuciapski, M. (2016) ‘Students Acceptance of m-Learning for Higher Education – UTAUT Model Validation’, Information Systems: Development, Research, Applications, Education, 264, pp. 155–166. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46642-2_11.

Mahande, R. D. and Malago, J. D. (2016) ‘AN E-LEARNING ACCEPTANCE EVALUATION THROUGH UTAUT MODEL IN A POSTGRADUATE PROGRAM’, JOURNAL OF EDUCATORS ONLINE.

Morris, N. P. et al. (2016) ‘Mobile technology: students perceived benefits of apps for learning neuroanatomy’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), pp. 430–442. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12144.

Navarro, C. X., Molina, A. I. and Redondo, M. A. (2016) ‘Factors influencing students’ acceptance in m-learning: A literature review and proposal of a taxonomy’, 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education, SIIE 2016: Learning Analytics Technologies, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751840.

Putera, A. P. et al. (2015) ‘Aplikasi M-Learning Berbasis Windows Phone Untuk Jurusan Teknologi Informasi’, Merpati, 3(2), pp. 87–95.

Salloum, Said A. Shaalan, K. (2019) Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning system in higher education using UTAUT and structural equation modeling approaches, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1.

Sugiyono (2008) Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D, Bandung: Alfabeta. Bandung.

Thongsri, N. et al. (2018) ‘Integrating UTAUT and UGT to explain behavioural intention to use M-learning: A developing country’s perspective’, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20(3), pp. 278–297. doi: 10.1108/JSIT-11-2017-0107.

Venkatesh et al. (2003) ‘User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View’, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), p. 425. doi: 10.2307/30036540.

Walsh, K. (2015) ‘Mobile Learning in Medical Education: Review’, Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 25(4), pp. 363–366.

Wong, K. et al. (2015) ‘Investigating Acceptance towards Mobile Learning in Higher Education Students’, CCIS, pp. 9–19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-46158-7_2.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-29

How to Cite

Ramadhani, J., & Purnawati, N. W. (2021). ANALISIS PENERIMAAN PENGGUNA TERHADAP MANAGEMENT LEARNING SYSTEM VILEP BERBASIS M-LEARNING PADA MAHASISWA JURUSAN GIZI DI POLITEKNIK KESEHATAN PALANGKA RAYA. Jurnal Kesehatan Tambusai, 2(2), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.31004/jkt.v2i2.1786

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): JUNI 2021

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 JUNI RAMADHANI MPH

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).